NUP Says Internal Disputes Have Tested Party Unity Ahead of 2026 Polls

The National Unity Platform (NUP) has acknowledged that internal disputes over the selection of flag bearers have tested the party’s cohesion, triggering defections, disciplinary action and sharp debate over whether the turmoil has weakened or ultimately strengthened Uganda’s leading opposition party.

As the 2026 general elections draw closer, NUP leaders describe the period as difficult but defining, following a contentious internal vetting process that left several aspirants dissatisfied. More than five years after its entry onto Uganda’s political scene, the party again faced accusations from some members who claimed the vetting exercise was unfair and lacked transparency.

Despite earlier controversy during local government selections that had raised expectations of reforms, NUP largely maintained the same vetting approach for parliamentary candidates. The outcome sparked mixed reactions nationwide, with celebrations among those awarded party tickets and frustration among those who missed out.

Several high-profile aspirants who failed to secure the NUP flag have since chosen to contest as independents. Party leaders say the move undermines unity, while the affected candidates argue it was their only viable political option.

NUP Secretary General Lewis Rubongoya has rejected claims that the party is facing a mass exodus.

“The number of people who defied the party position is very small compared to those who respected the decisions of the vetting committee,” Rubongoya said. “Our structures remain strong and intact.”

In response, the party has withdrawn membership from several individuals who opted to run as independents. Among them is David Musiri Bwogi, a former aspirant for the Makindye West parliamentary seat, now contesting under the Democratic Front banner. Musiri maintains that he was unfairly treated during the vetting process.

“I have no personal problem with the party president, Robert Kyagulanyi,” Musiri said. “But some senior leaders deliberately sidelined me. The process was not as transparent as claimed.”

While NUP leadership argues that enforcing discipline is essential to safeguard the party’s credibility, defectors contend that their departure has weakened the party’s electoral prospects.

“The gaps left behind are not easy to fill,” Musiri said. “You don’t lose experienced leaders and expect things to remain the same.”

Rubongoya strongly disputes that view, insisting the party remains focused on its broader mission.

“NUP is bigger than individuals,” he said. “We are functioning normally and concentrating on winning in 2026.”

Political analyst John Paul Kasujja believes the fallout could, in the long run, benefit the party.

“What we are witnessing is the exposure of individuals who were never fully committed to the party,” Kasujja said, adding that the vetting process has helped identify weak links. He urged NUP to use the moment to strengthen its internal leadership structures, arguing that this could make the party more resilient ahead of the elections.

As the 2026 polls approach, NUP says it is still awaiting guidance from the Electoral Commission regarding complaints from members who allege their party flags were fraudulently taken by rival aspirants.

“We have raised these concerns with the Electoral Commission and are waiting for their guidance,” Rubongoya said.

For now, NUP insists it remains united, even as critics warn that the divisions caused by the disputed vetting process may take time to heal.